Imagine that a platform for compliance costs $12,000 per year. Is it expensive?
The replacement it makes will determine the answer.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology-driven environment will eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious work, it could be an appropriate amount to spend. If a startup with seven employees could gather the same data manually in a few minutes each month, the calculation is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking what platform comes with the greatest features. Ask your company about how these features will help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing is a Break-Even Level
The automation of compliance isn’t always good or bad. Scale changes its value. Imagine a growing technology company with multiple cloud environments and multiple applications. The strain of manually gathering evidence over time could become extremely high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can quickly justify their cost.
Now think about a 10-person company that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
This is an important distinction to consider in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. While an advanced platform could offer many capabilities however, they’re only useful only when an organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a debate that is a simple feature-by feature exercise. Both are reputable software for compliance that is built around automation and integrations, so they can be compared in terms of supported frameworks, integrations, service, agreements, and individual quotes could be beneficial for companies searching for that method.
But there’s still another decision that you must take. Is your company interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain businesses would prefer automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Others prefer to present evidence on their own, especially if the work load is not too heavy.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Utilize the same model
Many well-known Vanta rivals compete in a category that is centered around automation. The market also includes lighter platforms designed around the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. CertAssist is a product developed by compliance consultants, internal auditors, as well as other experts, organizes controls frameworks within a central workspace. It lets you edit guidelines and policies for the auditing process, and allows auditors to review evidence via read-only access.
It doesn’t connect to operational systems, or create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence if they’ve chosen.
Consideration of System Access in the Making
The removal of integrations comes with a clear drawback: you have to gather evidence manually.
This eliminates the need for integration and the application of compliance does not require a connection to the operational environment.
The architectures are not universally superior. It is essential to consider which tradeoffs make sense for your company.
CertAssist is targeted at companies that comprise between five and 200 people and provides pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. The starting price is $225 per month which is comparable to the usual cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today might not be the same when you have 100 or even 500 employees.
Compliance can be maintained with the use of a simple platform. The costs of automation will grow as systems, staff and frameworks multiply. Better to let the complexity of compliance technology take its place.
Do not pay for 50 integrations merely because they appear attractive in a chart of comparison. You should pay for them only if you realize that the cost of the task manually is greater.